| Notes |
['Alenka Jensterle, 21.2.2013\r\nStandardizing\r\n\r\nJudgment/evaluation :\r\n\r\nNegative about work (id.): \r\n-too feminist\r\n-not enough psychology ( the caracter of the mather figure)\r\n-too ideological, not a literal text, too generally descriped.\r\n\r\nIs the author treated seriously:yes\r\n\r\n\r\nRecurrent elements of image building (gendered clichés, anecdotes) :\r\nKvedrova suppose to write too general about the men (not enough psychology).\r\n\r\nComparisons to/mentions of other women authors : comparision to Helena Malirova - she writes also about illusions - too general,\r\ncomparision to the authors belonging to Social democrat party.\r\n\r\nGender-[biased comments : ]\t\r\nComments on (supposed) feminism (id.):Objection to proto-feminist topoi such as:just feminine problems\r\n\r\n5TrSchoolFeb13\r\n\r\nI suppose this is a private letter. please correct if needed.\r\nsvdmay13']
|