Kirjallisuus katsaus. Novelleja. An overview of literature ARTICLE Finland
| Title | Kirjallisuus katsaus. Novelleja. An overview of literature |
|---|---|
| Is same as work | Kirjallisuus katsaus. Novelleja. |
| Author | Aavik, Johannes |
| Reference | |
| Place | Finland |
| Date | 1909 |
| Quotation | |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| VIAF | |
| Notes | ['Judgment/evaluation :\n-\tPositive about author \no\tReason : moral (religion related) value\n\n-\tPositive about work\n- good for women\n-\tNegative about author\nreason: lack of aestehetic value (writes for women)\n\n-\tNegative about work\n- not much to read for men\n\nTaking the author seriously (or not):\n-\tCanonizing effort for this author\n-\tUse of irony\n\nRecurrent elements of image building (gendered clichés, anecdotes) :\n-\tnone\n\nFinancial aspects, referring to :\n-\tnone\n\nComparisons to/mentions of other women authors : [provide names, with perhaps short comment]\n- writes only for women as Staël, Sand and Eliot do.\n\nComparisons to/mentions of male authors : [provide names, with perhaps short comment]\n- planty of them - Lagerlöf is an example of an writer that writes for women. There aro also writers that write for men, and such, that write for both men and women.\n\nComparisons to other countries : \n-none\n\nGender-[biased comments : ]\n-\tCorresponds (or not) to female norms [explain by short quote ]: Lagerlöf (as well as Sand, Eliot etc) writes according to female temperament and development.\n\n-\tRefusal/acceptation of “female” topoi as proposed in the work commented such as:\no\tnone\n\nConsidering the author’s use of (a minor) language as:\n-\tnone\n\nThe journalist onsiders as a good thing that men are going to write for men and women for women - so they will all find something to identify with.\n\nJW2013'] |
No works found
In this reception
| comments on person | Selma Ottilia Lovisa Lagerlöf |
Via received works
No persons found