| Notes |
['Ze ondertekent haar bijdrage slechts met \'E.\', de eerste letter van haar pseudoniem \'Elise\'. (Lauwerkrans, p. 911) (SP)\r\n\r\nBT was erg verguld met deze reactie; zie verwijzing naar de correspondentie met Mw. Groen van Prinsterer (SvD)\r\nmd\r\n\r\nForDWW19\r\n- female journalist takes distances from "normal" ways in which journalists tend to find negative aspects in works they comment\r\n- in particular this novel full of beauties she wants to show to the readers\r\n- description\r\n- appreciation: history reworked into beautiful scenes\r\n- thanking the novelist for this pure and noble pleasure, and "christianity"\r\n- this part of the series surpasses even the previous volumes\r\n- understanding of the soul, against storms of passion\r\n- surprised about the compatriots not having been impressed as they should have been\r\n- to be explained by the fact that not all are interesting in real knowledge of the human heart\r\n- much better than such now popular books as J.K. de Regt\'s Courantenjongen, and Susan Cummins\' Lamplighter\r\n- praises the writer because of her future glory, whom otherwise we would have complained because of her impressive labour\r\n- what is the value of these praises in a world where bad writing is not less applauded than productions of genius, where Bosboom-T is being compared to Mrs van Meerten. critics should stop being helpers of the librarians.\r\n- a woman who has penetrated so profoundly into Christian faith and religion should not have confidence in what we call "glory"\r\n- appreciation for her rare talents\r\n- those who do not know it by experience can not imagine the exhausting work which is behind such books\r\n- the genius of the authoress has been victorious over all kinds of difficulties\r\n- unsurpassable beauty of the psychological development of the 3 principal figures\r\n- Christian life made visible in all phases\r\n- truth and diversity of the other characters\r\n- would have liked to further detail the exceptional beauties of this wonderful work, but not possible\r\n- description of "public affairs" could have been less detailed\r\n- hopefully she will give us soon new work (suggests: Oldenbarnevelt)\r\nsvdmar11\r\n\r\nStandardizingsvdfeb14 [test - vorige wel even laten staan]\r\n\r\nAbstract:\r\n-\tYes\r\n-\tNo\r\n\r\nJudgment/evaluation :\r\n-\tPositive \r\no\tPlausibility ?pos\r\no\tMorals ?pos\r\n\r\n\r\nReference to good reputation or success already acquired \r\n-\tYes\r\n\r\n\r\nAttitude of the critic toward the author:\r\n-\tWelwillend\r\n- Very enthusiastic']
|